Re: Is spamkilling a Scarabite requirement?

Re: Is spamkilling a Scarabite requirement?:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Uli on September 28, 1999 at 18:07:31:

In Reply to: Is spamkilling a Scarabite requirement? posted by Jehannum on September 28, 1999 at 14:43:55:

Killing a rager is always good thing...
I believe all the ragers should be killed until
they all quit and none shows around...
Then everyone can go back to their studies:)
Indeed, three deaths in a row means -1 con,
and this is the thing they were struggling for.

Indeed, if you weren't a villager, I think
they shouldn't killed you so many times in a row.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Killing a rager is always good thing... > I believe all the ragers should be killed until > they all quit and none shows around... > Then everyone can go back to their studies:) > Indeed, three deaths in a row means -1 con, > and this is the thing they were struggling for. > Indeed, if you weren't a villager, I think > they shouldn't killed you so many times in a row.