hmph

hmph:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Ahmie on December 16, 1999 at 18:33:13:

In Reply to: New Rager Technique? posted by Confused on December 16, 1999 at 18:00:08:

> I guess if you are a rager and get attacked
> then you can just run to you cabal and then
> gangbang the person that is attacked you and
> follows you to try and finish the kill? I
> thought battle was courageous sounds like
> cowardy? Then, when he did ikiral one on one
> is right for a rager to attack him right away?
> So he would have to fight at least three
> different people to leave? Even though
> technically not a gang bang, would you consider
> that ragerlike?

Read the above post(s) to hear what I considered a problem. That the assassin was at the giant gives enough reason to assume he "could" attack it. Find a better example to whine about.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I guess if you are a rager and get attacked > > then you can just run to you cabal and then > > gangbang the person that is attacked you and > > follows you to try and finish the kill? I > > thought battle was courageous sounds like > > cowardy? Then, when he did ikiral one on one > > is right for a rager to attack him right away? > > So he would have to fight at least three > > different people to leave? Even though > > technically not a gang bang, would you consider > > that ragerlike? > Read the above post(s) to hear what I considered a problem. That the assassin was at the giant gives enough reason to assume he "could" attack it. Find a better example to whine about.