More relavant details:

More relavant details::
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Mithadris on December 23, 1999 at 19:32:31:

In Reply to: So would I :P (text) posted by Dhaevor on December 23, 1999 at 16:38:13:

Some more relevant details:

A point in the battle where the Zombie Lieutenant appeared to flee for no reason.

You did catch the conjurer without bound pets.

Ah well, it was an excellent fight, rolls just ended up in your favor, both sides did what they should have (few mistakes, certainly none any person with less than superhuman spam sorting skills could be criticized for doing), you just baned pretty much everything, and you hit hard as hell.

Difficult to fight someone at the warriors peak rank as a berserker rager.

Follow Ups:

Re: More relavant details: Zorszaul 20:09:50 12/23/99 (4)
- Your post has enlightened us all, thank you, Zorszaul. nt Mithadris 02:04:10 12/24/99 (2)
  - There are points in there if you get past being insulted. Zorszaul 10:12:18 12/24/99 (1)
    - Agreed. Dhaevor 12:03:17 12/24/99 (0)
- Apparently he is. n/t Newsboy 20:26:09 12/23/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Some more relevant details: > A point in the battle where the Zombie Lieutenant appeared to flee for no reason. > You did catch the conjurer without bound pets. > Ah well, it was an excellent fight, rolls just ended up in your favor, both sides did what they should have (few mistakes, certainly none any person with less than superhuman spam sorting skills could be criticized for doing), you just baned pretty much everything, and you hit hard as hell. > Difficult to fight someone at the warriors peak rank as a berserker rager.