Posted by Denorem on August 19, 1999 at 03:23:57:
In Reply to: Rager Courage posted by Kaerk on August 18, 1999 at 03:32:13:
I think your questions are mis-stated. Your questions pertain more to honor and ethics than courage. I've always classified courage as doing what you believe despite any retribution (So if you were a rager that strongly believed in gangbanging. Gangbanging despite the threat of uninduction would be courageous. Ironic, isn't it?). > Here are a few questions: > > Mage = Necro, Transmuter, Invoker, Anti-paladin > > 2. Attacking a warrior before asking him on his > 3. Attacking anyone that is naked? Mage? Warrior? > 4. Gangbanging before 35? Mage? Warrior? Master? > 5. Gangbanging after 35? Mage? Warrior? Master? > That is all for now I suppose. Could make up more If someone's gangbanging because they fear dying, that is cowardly. If someone's gangbanging because they want the person dead, doesn't seem to lack courage to me. Denorem
One thing I've always tried to do with Denorem is defend the village at any cost; even if he knows he'll die, he's going to try. But he has no quarrels with gangbanging (not because he thinks he needs uneven odds to win). Does that make him cowardly?
> Warrior = Bard, thief, assassin, ranger,
> Shaman, Paladin, Healer, Druid (Druid,Pal, Shaman
> and healer not really warriors but not use magic)
> 1. Attacking a warrior by himself with no mages
Why not?
> views if know he not an imperial and not wearing
> invisible stuff and all.
I don't see a problem with that
Feel bad about it, but I'd still do it.
Try to stay away from it, but if it comes up, probably jump in, unless told otherwise.
Same thing as 4.
> scenarios if needed.