Facts and or lack of them

Facts and or lack of them:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Graham on August 26, 1999 at 20:17:58:

In Reply to: You shouldn't be. posted by Nepenthe on August 26, 1999 at 13:21:23:

i cannot but assume that having a 10%(a random figure) chance of evading or spellbaning an area affect spell is MUCH better than having 0% chance of doing so...

now consider..
ragers USED to be unable to avoid area spells
rager NOW can avoid/spellbane them..(however much % of the time)

combined with the fact that they can now gang bang and that rangers/assassins/thieves/warriors have been adapted to make them less magically orientated (a move for which i thank the gods)

basically everything has happened at the same time and is unsettling

berserker ragers have lost nothing and have only gained...
the other ones are better

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> i cannot but assume that having a 10%(a random figure) chance of evading or spellbaning an area affect spell is MUCH better than having 0% chance of doing so... > now consider.. > ragers USED to be unable to avoid area spells > rager NOW can avoid/spellbane them..(however much % of the time) > combined with the fact that they can now gang bang and that rangers/assassins/thieves/warriors have been adapted to make them less magically orientated (a move for which i thank the gods) > basically everything has happened at the same time and is unsettling > berserker ragers have lost nothing and have only gained... > the other ones are better