Re: Explain your own statement, please:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Nepenthe on October 08, 1999 at 03:12:15:

In Reply to: Re: Explain your own statement, please posted by Joshu on October 08, 1999 at 01:22:34:


I'm not trying to be excessively vague here; ideally people in Master these days should clearly understand what I'm talking about.

> Wasn't the learning requirements dropped, or the timing of it at least, in some way related to conjurers coming in?

Twist and I had been wanting to make a certain change to the cabal for a pretty damn long time, which in fact did largely require conjurers to be in. It happened about a week after if I remember rightly. Assorted other rethoughts of the Master rules/ideology we'd been pondering went in at the same time. I expect you know what those were.

> Because I can only imagine what hell it must've been for master conjurers to master bind demon and similar spells.

I'm sure it is, but that's not really any reason to go easy on them. I'm sure it was hell for Jarmel to master unholy blessing and scrolls as a Fire A-P too. Masters are still expected to be more studious than most, despite the present lack of formal requirements. If you're a Master and neglect your studies, expect a visit from Twist or I. A few Masters have already seen this since the requirements went, including (but not limited to) some of the conjurers.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]