Not even that would work. I'd start killing at 11 so that my numbers when I got to 31+ were high enough to be ranked. (nt)

Not even that would work. I'd start killing at 11 so that my numbers when I got to 31+ were high enough to be ranked. (nt):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Sinakil on October 25, 1999 at 10:43:38:

In Reply to: WRONG!...They grow in numbers!.BADLY!An idea...put the pk list over the 31-41..and 41-51..the other need to be deleted..N/T posted by kunoll on October 24, 1999 at 08:52:33:

> > > ...as few people will actually come out and say "ooc: I wonder how far I've got to go before I get 15th on the pk-list." BUT, BUT, the easiest way to draw the connection is to look at the fools that come here and ask questions about "How many kills do I need before my heart explodes?"

> > > The pk-list serves no useful function, and I myself have suggested alternatives to the pk-list that would probably be even more informative and worthwhile(ie: allowing a char to see his ratio in a sort of search format where you put in your char name/password and get your kill ratio etcetera).

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > ...as few people will actually come out and say "ooc: I wonder how far I've got to go before I get 15th on the pk-list." BUT, BUT, the easiest way to draw the connection is to look at the fools that come here and ask questions about "How many kills do I need before my heart explodes?" > > > > The pk-list serves no useful function, and I myself have suggested alternatives to the pk-list that would probably be even more informative and worthwhile(ie: allowing a char to see his ratio in a sort of search format where you put in your char name/password and get your kill ratio etcetera).