Re: Entropy:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by petro on October 28, 1999 at 12:37:21:

In Reply to: Entropy posted by Niblaznacker on October 28, 1999 at 12:22:50:

>
> You dont even mention entropy.
> I must say of all the cabals Ive played
> Entropy is the most fun. I got bastardised by Pico as jachyra,
> which I was really annoyed about and almost deleted, but instead used it
> as an opportunity to learn more - and man did I!
> More roleplaying improved dramatically.

> Entropy could really be one of the most influential of the cabals but it just
> lacks in membership numbers. Why could they be so influential?
> Because they arent predictable - arbiters, most other cabals wont attack, entropy will.
> Empire will take a beating as well. But none of the other cabals are safe either, but
> entropy dosent have all out wars with them.

> So what am I blabbing on about?
> Roll an entropy.. its so much fun!!

I think entropy's numbers would increase if you didn't have to act like an idiot to get in.
Where did the idea come from that in order to be chaotic you had to like a loon. I tried to
get a character in once on the stance that the character hated all laws and those that enforced
them or those that tried to force their views on others. Not only were Arbs and Empire targets,
but this assassin even hated ragers for trying to enforce their idea of no magic on others. Forgot
who I interviewed with, but they didn't seem to have a problem with this aspect of my character,
but wanted to see me "act" chaotic. He had me follow him around galadon while he emoted goofy
actions to others, to show me how it was done. When I didn't want to do the same that was it for me,
interview over. Why do you have to act like an idiot to be considered truely chaotic?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]