Re: Permagrouping is far more offensive than the PKs. (n/t)

Re: Permagrouping is far more offensive than the PKs. (n/t):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Proud Blade on November 04, 1999 at 13:20:11:

In Reply to: Laugh....only 27 pks and they want my head....NT posted by Vizthvor on November 04, 1999 at 12:17:51:

> > > As far as permagrouping, we do roleplay it. I would group with Empire but they will not allow it. I guess if we are killing ragers, masters will not mind tagging along but I wanted to keep others out of the process.. But if you see it being a big so-called problem, I guess we will just join Scarab *wink* and do the ole..."you are weak, you die!" Or maybe Empire.

> > There's only two other Therans you could group with? Or are you roleplaying a "OOC friend PK team"?

> > Pathetic. Clowns like these three and the Palan/Yagar/Tamuera team are the bane of CF.

Follow Ups:

Not really. Permagrouping is only a problem when pking is successful Vizthvor 13:38:09 11/04/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > > As far as permagrouping, we do roleplay it. I would group with Empire but they will not allow it. I guess if we are killing ragers, masters will not mind tagging along but I wanted to keep others out of the process.. But if you see it being a big so-called problem, I guess we will just join Scarab wink and do the ole..."you are weak, you die!" Or maybe Empire. > > > There's only two other Therans you could group with? Or are you roleplaying a "OOC friend PK team"? > > > Pathetic. Clowns like these three and the Palan/Yagar/Tamuera team are the bane of CF.