Re: What would work better....

Re: What would work better....:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by BigBadJakk on November 11, 1999 at 14:57:20:

In Reply to: What would work better.... posted by Fire Giant Warrior on November 11, 1999 at 12:56:53:

Personally, I like drum better than flurry, theres only a two round lag on it, and no drain of mvs, though, it does generally less attacks. Boneshatter is pretty wicked too, but, on the other hand, you can't parry worth a damn with the maces. I'd go with mace, and maybe some kind of defensive. (polearm or HtH)

> I heard that riposte is strength based....
> and I've seen what flurry can do with a
> fire giant.

> But I've heard drum has a lower lag, and
> works great on gnomes/svirfs....so

> OPINIONS?

> FGW

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Personally, I like drum better than flurry, theres only a two round lag on it, and no drain of mvs, though, it does generally less attacks. Boneshatter is pretty wicked too, but, on the other hand, you can't parry worth a damn with the maces. I'd go with mace, and maybe some kind of defensive. (polearm or HtH) > > I heard that riposte is strength based.... > > and I've seen what flurry can do with a > > fire giant. > > But I've heard drum has a lower lag, and > > works great on gnomes/svirfs....so > > OPINIONS? > > FGW