Re: Cabals, fairness or the lack thereof

Re: Cabals, fairness or the lack thereof:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Zix on November 11, 1999 at 15:57:07:

In Reply to: Cabals, fairness or the lack thereof posted by Ponderer(VIP) on November 11, 1999 at 12:51:38:

That sounds nice, but it doesn't make much sense. When you say that there is no reason, "except for RP", to NOT become part of a cabal, it makes me wonder: What other reason would there be to do anything?

While rolling a character I settle on where s/he's from, who the parents are, some history, and the beliefs of the character, but the cabal doesn't seem that important to the character itself. Most of my characters *ended up* in cabals, but often I didn't expect it or was actually shooting for a different cabal.

For example, if a character is chaotic, they make not like any cabals at all because they symbolize order (except for Entropy, which really should be an anti-cabal or something.)

Anyway, just my 2 cents.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > That sounds nice, but it doesn't make much sense. When you say that there is no reason, "except for RP", to NOT become part of a cabal, it makes me wonder: What other reason would there be to do anything? > While rolling a character I settle on where s/he's from, who the parents are, some history, and the beliefs of the character, but the cabal doesn't seem that important to the character itself. Most of my characters ended up in cabals, but often I didn't expect it or was actually shooting for a different cabal. > For example, if a character is chaotic, they make not like any cabals at all because they symbolize order (except for Entropy, which really should be an anti-cabal or something.) > Anyway, just my 2 cents.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]