Re: The debate

Re: The debate:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Tdr(VIP) on November 30, 1999 at 18:23:12:

In Reply to: Paladin are lawful. Why isn't an A-P Choatic? posted by Not fair? on November 30, 1999 at 16:53:33:

> Paladins have to be lawful. So wouldn't it make some sense that Anti Paladins be choatic, or they can't be ever be lawful? Thoughts comments?

Anti-Paladins, by thier broad nature, are not limited in the same fashion as a paladin for
a very simple reason. They dont want to be. To be 'anti' does not mean it has to be an opposite in
every way. There were Paladins and Anti-Paladins who followed Cador, all upholding thier code of
honor. What, because I'm evil, I have to stab you in the back?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Paladins have to be lawful. So wouldn't it make some sense that Anti Paladins be choatic, or they can't be ever be lawful? Thoughts comments? > Anti-Paladins, by thier broad nature, are not limited in the same fashion as a paladin for > a very simple reason. They dont want to be. To be 'anti' does not mean it has to be an opposite in > every way. There were Paladins and Anti-Paladins who followed Cador, all upholding thier code of > honor. What, because I'm evil, I have to stab you in the back?