Well....Harandor was a complete idiot from what I remember.

Well....Harandor was a complete idiot from what I remember.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Someone on December 02, 1999 at 06:24:43:

In Reply to: Paladin vs Anti-Paladin, may I throw in one log from the past? posted by Waigerits(VIP) on December 02, 1999 at 03:57:03:

As a Paladin, he sucked (had little of what makes a paladin a paladin). Should have just been a shaman.

As a pker, he sucked even more.

Most of his kills if he had any came because he was grouped with about 4 ragers or 4 warders. One on one fights, I seen him lose badly all the time.

As fars as an Paladin vs an Anti-Paladin, you need to remember one thing. An anti-paladin is a mage. Like other mages, when they are prepared they can kick some major ass. The key is to get them when they do not have all their wands up. If Paladins werent so boring I would consider playing one again and show how easy it is to kill with them.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > As a Paladin, he sucked (had little of what makes a paladin a paladin). Should have just been a shaman. > As a pker, he sucked even more. > Most of his kills if he had any came because he was grouped with about 4 ragers or 4 warders. One on one fights, I seen him lose badly all the time. > As fars as an Paladin vs an Anti-Paladin, you need to remember one thing. An anti-paladin is a mage. Like other mages, when they are prepared they can kick some major ass. The key is to get them when they do not have all their wands up. If Paladins werent so boring I would consider playing one again and show how easy it is to kill with them.