Please read...

Please read...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Webster on December 23, 1999 at 05:18:18:

In Reply to: in fact... posted by Graham on December 23, 1999 at 04:54:26:

> IT WAS A **RHETORICAL QUESTION** FOR GODS SAKE MAN!
> the answer is NO!

Please use my dictionary and look this term up and then ask yourself, "Did I just base my whole argument on a fallible statement, which I proved to be fallible by answering it myself?". Note: This is not meant to be a RHETORICAL question.

Follow Ups:

The point is , he obviously didn't know the answer despite it being utterly apparent, i wasn't leaving room for error Graham 07:05:11 12/24/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > IT WAS A RHETORICAL QUESTION FOR GODS SAKE MAN! > > the answer is NO! > Please use my dictionary and look this term up and then ask yourself, "Did I just base my whole argument on a fallible statement, which I proved to be fallible by answering it myself?". Note: This is not meant to be a RHETORICAL question.