Speaking of Dawn.

Speaking of Dawn.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by An ex-dawnie on December 30, 1999 at 09:56:20:

During my days as a Dawnie I never quite
understood why was all that pacifisam
neccessary for the cabal. I don't think that
Dawn should be all that non-aggressive.
I still cannot understand why they are that
way..

Follow Ups:

Re: Speaking of Dawn. Someone 10:54:23 12/30/99 (6)
- *cheer* Bring the knights back! n/t fan of knights 11:21:32 12/30/99 (5)
  - You all seem to be forgetting that CF'ers can't roleplay a knight right, and therefore it's your own damn fault they were disbanded. nt Salipek/Carvahlin 12:25:25 12/30/99 (4)
    - *shrug* My actions are not associated with those who suck at rping knights. Some can, most cant. Too bad for us that can. n/t still a fan of knights 12:51:23 12/30/99 (3)
      - forest for the trees... Shokai(IMM) 13:38:48 12/30/99 (2)
        
        does anyone remember exitilus? kinda new at cf, really old at mudding 15:42:18 12/30/99 (0)
        
        I will cherish the idea that your ideas are put into action Shokai n/t Oracle 13:44:14 12/30/99 (0)
speaking of dogma An Immortal(IMM) 10:28:50 12/30/99 (2)
- Re: speaking of dogma an ex-dawnie 11:21:05 12/30/99 (1)
  - Umm, you don't have to be a pacifist to be in Dawn, you just have to be able to keep your priorities straight. nt Salipek/Carvahlin 12:24:37 12/30/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> During my days as a Dawnie I never quite > understood why was all that pacifisam > neccessary for the cabal. I don't think that > Dawn should be all that non-aggressive. > I still cannot understand why they are that > way..