Posted by battleboy on September 28, 2000 at 11:13:36:

In Reply to: etiher you don't read carefully or you are proud blade posted by Rooqweaz on September 28, 2000 at 09:19:00:

>
> > Now I do not get where you are going with the negative and positive propositions but I really do not see the point in it. You should have a role if your character is doing something "wierd" and it is a good idea to have a role if you are playing a normal character.

> > Stop trying to compare apples with oranges especially when you only have a barrel of apples.

> ok, I will try to demonstrate the structure to make it easier for you.

> No imms agree you only need a role when you do something wierd
> => so there are case when: you need a role and you don't something wierd.
> (for example, when imm don't know you., you can add more cases)
> => does not mean you need a role in every cases
> nor it is good idea to have a role when you are playing a normal char
> (ok, maybe it is better you have, but it is not what WAS SAID)

> about negative/positive
> simply two predicats ".not." or positive

> Cyradia: .NOT. truth - "you need a role only when..."
> me truth - "you need .. when..."

> and I DO NOT COMPARE
> even more, I SAID YOU CAN"T COMPARE these two propositions
> like PROUD BLADE DID.
> clear?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup