Re: There is no more "legion" for a reason.:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Character Board ]

Posted by Jaehiko on June 20, 2000 at 10:15:17:

In Reply to: There is no more "legion" for a reason. posted by Graatch(VIP) on June 20, 2000 at 08:38:28:

Why must I conform to what the typical Anti-Paladin is? If you look at the log he isn't the typical Drow, by not being submissive to the female of the species. Anti-Paladins have always hated 'weakness and goodness'... The Anti-Paladin Legion was to strengthen the entire guild. The only reason it died was because no one was willing to RP it anymore.

'That smacks of ooc wanting safety in your guild so making an ic reason to make nice with other antipaladins.'

Of course it's an OOC reason. When you go to make a new character don't you think of what you would like it to stand for? Perhaps even doing something that's not very popular, so that people are forced to recognize you?

-Jaehiko.

> Have you read the helpfile for antipaladin? Have you read the information in the mud school room for antipaladins?

> They are not nice people. It is weakness and goodness they hate. But you are saying you will help the weaker antipaladins, that you wouldn't take advantage of someone of your guild, that you wouldn't treat them the same way you treat the rest of the world. That smacks of ooc wanting safety in your guild so making an ic reason to make nice with other antipaladins. I dont think it's a real viable role because I believe it contradicts most of what an antipaladin is all about.
> Just my .02.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Character Board ]