Re: Dawn questions.

Re: Dawn questions.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by frown on June 21, 2000 at 12:17:04:

In Reply to: Re: Dawn questions. posted by Knight Rider on June 21, 2000 at 01:56:22:

> So in the simplest terms they can help >others without the pain of fighting a war. >Thus the reason they have no item.

How come then 9 times out of 10, if the codex is gone it is because dawnies took it and gave it to sylvan/battle?

Is this not fighting a war?

Is it fair that a cabal can war with another, but the other has no recourse of action?

Follow Ups:

Well, you could try and slaughter the sh*t out of us. nt Nivek 14:52:47 6/21/2000 (0)
You may want to check your figures again.... TSM 12:43:54 6/21/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > So in the simplest terms they can help >others without the pain of fighting a war. >Thus the reason they have no item. > > How come then 9 times out of 10, if the codex is gone it is because dawnies took it and gave it to sylvan/battle? > > Is this not fighting a war? > > Is it fair that a cabal can war with another, but the other has no recourse of action?