Re: thats prolly not a bad idea.. but 5 mins I think is far to long

Re: thats prolly not a bad idea.. but 5 mins I think is far to long:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Still a bit pissed on June 25, 2000 at 21:30:53:

In Reply to: thats prolly not a bad idea.. but 5 mins I think is far to long posted by Niblaznacker on June 25, 2000 at 21:02:43:

>> if rebboting from a crash, give for the players who log on in the next 5 mins a ghost status.
> you can do quite a bit in 5 mins if you need to run from something

I meant something like:

[MUD] 12:57:00> crash!
[MUD] 13:00:00> back online, accepting logins from player port.
[MUD] 13:00:01> ghost login til 13:05:01 set.

So everyone who logs in from 13:00:01 (hour:min:sec) to 13:05:01 would have some ticks in ghost (3 ticks?).

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> >> if rebboting from a crash, give for the players who log on in the next 5 mins a ghost status. > > you can do quite a bit in 5 mins if you need to run from something > > I meant something like: > > [MUD] 12:57:00> crash! > [MUD] 13:00:00> back online, accepting logins from player port. > [MUD] 13:00:01> ghost login til 13:05:01 set. > > So everyone who logs in from 13:00:01 (hour:min:sec) to 13:05:01 would have some ticks in ghost (3 ticks?).