Current Imbalance between cabals (text)

Current Imbalance between cabals (text):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Cabal Equalizer on July 31, 2000 at 16:21:07:

Here is a little something I noticed

Empires enemies: Dawn, Sylvan, Battle, Entropy

Battles enemies: Masters and Empire

Masters enemies: Sylvan and Ragers

Arbiters enemies: All at one time or another except Masters and Empire, and all those battles against the other cabals arent taken out on Arbiter really when someone is wanted.

Entropy: Arbiters and Imperials

Dawn: Empire

Yes yes, I know that there is fighting between ragers and sylvan mages for example.

but those battles dont incite cabal wars.

It seems to me that Empire gets the shaft when it comes to enemies.

If game balance worked like it was supposed to, and Empire had overwhelming numbers then yes it would be balanced.

But from what I have noticed Empire never seems to have more members on at any given time than ragers.

This is worded poorly but I think you all understand.

Can anyone give me some input?

Follow Ups:

empire brings it on itself Magtograme 18:38:46 7/31/2000 (2)
- Re: empire brings it on itself Yar 20:42:58 7/31/2000 (1)
  - Re: empire brings it on itself Magtograme 20:46:44 7/31/2000 (0)
You completely left out the Scarabs N/T Ashiim 17:17:40 7/31/2000 (0)
Re: Current Imbalance between cabals (text) Snick 17:01:32 7/31/2000 (5)
- Then perhaps in empire it should be easier to be inducted w/o the sect leader or emperor, so that empire can get the numbers it needs n/t Balancer 23:26:05 7/31/2000 (4)
  - How do you get easier than everyone being able to induct others into becoming citizens? (NT) {btw. This is a retorical question} The Return of Someone 16:21:55 8/1/2000 (3)
    - Don't know where you got the idea that any citizen can induct but you are wrong. N/T Pendragon_Surtr 18:50:18 8/1/2000 (2)
      - Perhaps I phrased it wrong, or perhaps you misunderstood. Someone, A New Hope. 19:26:32 8/1/2000 (1)
        
        Not 2...3 (NT) Doh 19:41:33 8/1/2000 (0)
Sure: Someone 16:29:36 7/31/2000 (2)
- If he manages to avoid lashing himself. [nt] Carbonated Love 18:00:25 7/31/2000 (0)
- Heh, when Havilahd becomes a lich?? n/t Cabal Equalizer 16:41:16 7/31/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Here is a little something I noticed > Empires enemies: Dawn, Sylvan, Battle, Entropy > Battles enemies: Masters and Empire > Masters enemies: Sylvan and Ragers > Arbiters enemies: All at one time or another except Masters and Empire, and all those battles against the other cabals arent taken out on Arbiter really when someone is wanted. > Entropy: Arbiters and Imperials > Dawn: Empire > > Yes yes, I know that there is fighting between ragers and sylvan mages for example. > but those battles dont incite cabal wars. > It seems to me that Empire gets the shaft when it comes to enemies. > If game balance worked like it was supposed to, and Empire had overwhelming numbers then yes it would be balanced. > But from what I have noticed Empire never seems to have more members on at any given time than ragers. > This is worded poorly but I think you all understand. > Can anyone give me some input?

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]