Posted by curious on August 6, 2000 at 08:19:27:

In Reply to: You would think so, maybe the healers shouldnt allow it. n/t posted by Daishan(VIP) on August 6, 2000 at 01:52:43:

> > isn't it bad for a lightwalker to heal at a dark temple or a evil one to heal at the sun temple?

Follow Ups:

• No, because it is HIS temple. n/t Daishan 10:30:58 8/6/2000 (10)
  • ummm no. The First Apostle 16:43:35 8/7/2000 (0)
  • but hes still paying the goodie healer..... (nt) Magtograme 14:01:20 8/6/2000 (7)
    • He's giving a goodie healer tithes he stole from the common masses, so that he can stay alive and in power, so he can collect more taxes, etc...I see no problem.(n/t) Entragin 14:06:34 8/6/2000 (6)
      • The evil altar is no more than 11 steps away. He's being lazy and is donating to the light. I think it's weak. nt Imbrogno 14:22:19 8/6/2000 (5)
        • The Evil healer is no more part of the empire than the lightwalker, neither are citizens or bloodoaths. n/t Daishan 16:03:34 8/6/2000 (4)
          • I have to agree with Imbrogno... its like a buddhist going to a christians church for blessing when his temple is next door. Magtograme 16:25:56 8/6/2000 (3)
            • Blame the healers, those whores'll take coins from anyone. Not named 18:39:42 8/6/2000 (2)
              • If you reread this thread it's really funny, considering it's over something so petty. How many Lightwalkers have healed themselves at the Dark Temple, eh? (n/t) Zepachu, in an effort to keep the weird curve going with this thread. 19:19:01 8/6/2000 (1)
                • I don't cause I find it broke the roleplay n/t curious 20:46:40 8/6/2000 (0)
  • That's weak. nt Imbrogno 13:13:15 8/6/2000 (0)

Post a Followup