Posted by Rome on September 24, 1999 at 02:22:42:
In Reply to: Why don't the other cabal like Scarab? posted by Raythgar on September 23, 1999 at 09:29:09:
>Why would the cabals attack the scarab? I know Dawn doesn't do much of anything.
They may not often do much of anything, but if they were going to do something, it would be against the scarabs or empire. They can easily be counted as one of the scarabs set-in-stone enemies.
True, they wouldn't care about scarabs.. except for the fact the a majority of them are mages. After all, why do they fight with empire so much? Because they all use magic... (Does offer up the question.. what about dawn and sylvan.. but oh well). Scarabs are also pretty chummy with the masters.
> Sylvan? don't they take care of the forest? Do they have a pollicy on hunting down evil people (like battles with mages) at all costs?
No, they don't care about evil at all. They do have an inate dislike of liches though, and scarabs got a big one sitting there lookin' at ya funny. Not a big point in there favor.
Very true, unfortunately for the scarabs, they're almost always wanted.
No, they want everyone to take the bloodoath, something that is opposed by the scarabs religion. Scarabs are forced to hate empire as much as they'd ever hate a servant of the dawn. Doesn't help that empire likes taking every item they can get their hands on.
No problem.. there you go. On the bright side, scarabs, you would think, would have a lovely relationship with entropy... (and probably troupe as well).. for all the good that would do them.
...Rome...
> Ragers? they hate magic, they don't care if your good or evil. Not all scarbs are mages?
> Arbiters? they don't do anything unless the scarab member attacked in town.
> Empire? why would they care about the scarab? Don't they just want everyone to be evil lawful.
>Of course feel free to correct me (I know I'm wrong about a lot of these, but this is how these cabal appear to act to an outside observer).