I don't know why I bother (possibly the last reply, since this is going nowhere fast):

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Nepenthe on September 27, 1999 at 05:47:53:

In Reply to: Re: Inane debates posted by Ophi on September 27, 1999 at 04:55:14:


> If you had followed the entire post, you would know I had readily agreed, that my facts and presumptions may be wrong.

No, you didn't. I said you can't take incorrect premises and arrive at truth reasoning from them (and only them). You jumped on that. Yes, the logic can be sound despite the unsoundness of its foundation. That doesn't mean what it produces has any value.

You disagreed, and thus I questioned your qualification to speak on the subject of logic.

> Yet he continued along, suddenly decided to start to "speak plainly", insulted my intelligence, called me a phony, said my arguments illogical and unreasoning, and even went as far as saying, "If I think you're being an ass, I'll tell you you're being an ass."

If you want to be offended, be offended. That wasn't initially my intention, but I certainly won't lose any sleep if you are.

You stated a belief that you felt it was better to act smug and arrogant towards someone rather than just come out and tell them you have a problem with them. I disagree.

Further, in my opinion, words are just words. There aren't some of them with evil power. Probably, there is no appreciable difference between telling someone you think they're being an ass and telling them you think they're being a jerk, or whatever.


> 1st. I had posted with regard to his comment (and a correct reasoning based on false facts on conjurers), he had posted with regard to my educational qualification, background and intelligence.

Only when you persisted in defending something you were told (civilly, you should love that) was incorrect, and why.

> 2nd. I re-posted it on the top of the log board (since forum board is down) instead of a personal note to Nepenthe in CF, since this is not a character to character thing, but instead, one man's opinion versus another on the public forum.

Whatever. I've grown bored with it. If you want to grandstand and say "Look, everyone! I was being an ass and the imm told me I was being an ass instead of smiling at me! Help! Help! I'm being repressed!" knock yourself out. I don't much care, and I suspect most of the forum crowd is intelligent enough to see it for that.

> In response to you, I didn't start this volley war. It was he who asked whether I passed my classes, that I was being an ass.

Well, you were being an ass. I'll stand by that call.

> is too hard for you to keep track, maybe you should go eat "CITRUS flavored agar" made from LIME.

I don't think you have any grounds to take shots at Braerus' intelligence. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. They especially shouldn't throw stones at houses made of sturdier materials.

> But wait a minute... I thought y'all complained that players flame y'all imms using vulgarity?

I don't really think calling someone an ass is all that vulgar. I don't see much point in showing you what vulgar really is. Still, they're just words. The problem is when someone resorts to using them as a replacement for reason and real content. In my book, that would still be a step up on a poor attempt at the use of reason, because it doesn't pretend to be anything other than what it is. Yes, it is possible to use logic poorly even if the logic itself is correct. I'm not ready to cede that it is correct, but I see no point in arguing over that.

Oh. One more thing. I still think you're being an ass with respect to this whole thread, though, I might be as well.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]