Re: this is why.

Re: this is why.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Log Board ]

Posted by Saerin on October 14, 1999 at 08:05:38:

In Reply to: Re: An addition posted by Diarmuid/Graatch on October 14, 1999 at 03:01:28:

> Why are you all trying to justify a current problem by saying there were problems in the past? Does that make it right? Sheesh, didn't you all listen when your parents told you two wrongs don't make a right?

Because it's rather curious coming from the person who's making the comment.
You are pointing out that berserker ragers basically invalidate an entire class.
Is your observations justified? Sure.

The perception is when something isn't going your way, you complain about it.
When it does go your way (ie. conjurers), you don't say a thing, and after the
fact claim they've been weakened too much.

Follow Ups:

Uh, I don't have an invoker or Master anymore, and didn't when I made this post. I get nothing from conjurers now, I get no benefit from nightgaunts. n/t Diarmuid/Graatch 17:05:02 10/14/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Why are you all trying to justify a current problem by saying there were problems in the past? Does that make it right? Sheesh, didn't you all listen when your parents told you two wrongs don't make a right? > Because it's rather curious coming from the person who's making the comment. > You are pointing out that berserker ragers basically invalidate an entire class. > Is your observations justified? Sure. > The perception is when something isn't going your way, you complain about it. > When it does go your way (ie. conjurers), you don't say a thing, and after the > fact claim they've been weakened too much. >