Re: my take:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Cathoir on August 11, 1999 at 16:53:45:

In Reply to: my take posted by Vimal on August 11, 1999 at 12:12:43:

This isn't reiterated enough ic, but here is our policy. If the person that is fighting isn't a transmuter, invoker, anti-paladin, or necromancer... then you need to sit back and watch unless the odds are even. Certain non-mage classes we sometimes will consider mages if they are annoying enough (ie. Tasari who could never fight us on his own but always needed somebody after he stunned). Now, one other thing. This is more of a gray area... but I think I can speak for the cabal here. If the non-mage class is hasted, sanc'd, invoker shield', or helped by magic... then they have aid in their battle, and you can too if you wish. Aid being another rager or such. Now, this policy isn't always followed, but as long as you do your best to go by it you shouldn't get in any trouble. Repeated gangbangers tend to get kicked, but if you make a mistake then just learn from it. For the most part, we do take your word over the whiny little girls who complain getting gangbanged when that is the only thought on their mind when they plan to fight us.


On a side note, when somebody says 90% of ragers don't care for our ideals, that is a quick way to show complete ignorance about our cabal. We have excellent immortal supervision and if things were really they way that all these whiny bitches make it out to be, Boltthrower and Nimbus would have disbanded us long ago (they've proven they aren't afraid to do things like that).

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]