Re: Scarabites:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Observing Observer on August 27, 1999 at 05:19:44:

In Reply to: Re: Scarabites posted by Scarabite1 on August 27, 1999 at 05:02:01:

> Look, you can stop with the condesending, smartass remarks. I understand plenty. If we kill their membership I expect our membership to be killed. I do not expect for cabal items to be brought into it. You attack the cabal item when you disagree with the cabal's beliefs. You attack the members when you don't agree with the member's actions.
> I'm hoping that you understand this point...I'm speaking in as simple english as I know. If you understand and disagree, you can say so instead of pretending not to hear what's being said.

I'm being a bit condescending because you don't get it.
If Scarabs continue to kill ragers, give me one
good reason why ragers shouldn't take the icon? So far
you haven't come close to doing so.
Your weak, and pointless response amounts to keeping
the fight between the membership and leave the items out
of it.
If your scarab wanted to continually hunt me as a rager
or my village brothers, I'm going to take away the source
of some of your power. Does this make sense, or am I talking
to dead wood?

> You attack the cabal item when you disagree with the cabal's beliefs.

Oh give me a break. If the Imperials take the orb away
because they think the Tower is weak, how does that disagree with
the Tower's love of magic? According to your view, the imperials
should never take the Orb because the imperials aren't against
magic.

There are going to be circumstances when taking the item of another
cabal is expected and necessary and it may not have to do with
ideology.

Of course I could point out the number of times cabals have started
scuffles and taken items for reasons other than straight opposition
to the cabals beliefs, but I imagine I'd be wasting time.

Understand? Good. Class dismissed.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]