Re: Scarabites

Re: Scarabites:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Scarabite1 on August 27, 1999 at 05:02:01:

In Reply to: Re: Scarabites posted by Observing Observer on August 27, 1999 at 04:31:04:

Look, you can stop with the condesending, smartass remarks. I understand plenty. If we kill their membership I expect our membership to be killed. I do not expect for cabal items to be brought into it. You attack the cabal item when you disagree with the cabal's beliefs. You attack the members when you don't agree with the member's actions.
I'm hoping that you understand this point...I'm speaking in as simple english as I know. If you understand and disagree, you can say so instead of pretending not to hear what's being said.

> > Pay attention...the point is they didn't raid for the head. Player fighting doesn't translate into Cabal wars. Battle/Cult war is random. Yes, most of their characters won't get along...but do the rules of Battle conflict with the beliefs of the Scarabs??

> Oh ye of little understanding.

> If you continue to attack/kill another cabal's membership, what
> do you expect to happen?

>
> >
> > > Let's see, maybe they just take it because the
> > > Sacrabites want to be enemies with Battle.

> > > Grissztok - will attack battle on sight

> > > Zaendiir - Mage but tends to only attack battle
> > > if they already engaged

> > > Draktha - Mage, attacks battle on sight

> > > Some wolf that I do not remember the name.

> > > As far as I know at least in hero range,
> > > the cabal always tends to attack the Battleragers
> > > and seek to be enemies unlike Arbiter or entropy.
> > > so why not take theif item and make them a little
> > > less powerful?

> > >
> > >
> > > > Complaint: Battleragers taking the Scarab item

> > > > Reason:
> > > > This is going to sign like a whine, as if we can't handle getting the object back. That's not really it, though. I'd have a problem with this, regardless. Yes, the Cult is made up almost exclusivly from mages. And battle should definitly hunt down and kill these mages at any given time. However, I don't know of any reason why they would have a problem with the Cult and their beliefs. You don't see Battle raiding Arbiter or Entropy because they accept mages. I think one should only attack a Cabal for the item when the Cabal has "sinned" against their beliefs. And if a person in the cabal has "sinned"...then kill the person. They should be two seperate issues.

Follow Ups:

You must be retarded. Lucian 02:35:18 8/29/99 (0)
Re: Scarabites Stealer of Souls 05:28:15 8/27/99 (0)
Re: Scarabites Stealer of Souls 05:21:59 8/27/99 (0)
Re: Scarabites Observing Observer 05:19:44 8/27/99 (5)
- Hm...ok. The Great Rumpus Cat 13:41:32 8/28/99 (4)
  - Re: Hm...ok. Observing Observer 15:15:55 8/28/99 (3)
    - Ah ha. The Great Rumpus Cat 15:42:45 8/28/99 (2)
      - Re: Your answer should be in the form of a question. Observing Observer 16:23:18 8/28/99 (1)
        
        Re: Your answer should be in the form of a question. The Great Rumpus Cat 02:39:03 8/30/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Look, you can stop with the condesending, smartass remarks. I understand plenty. If we kill their membership I expect our membership to be killed. I do not expect for cabal items to be brought into it. You attack the cabal item when you disagree with the cabal's beliefs. You attack the members when you don't agree with the member's actions. > I'm hoping that you understand this point...I'm speaking in as simple english as I know. If you understand and disagree, you can say so instead of pretending not to hear what's being said. > > > Pay attention...the point is they didn't raid for the head. Player fighting doesn't translate into Cabal wars. Battle/Cult war is random. Yes, most of their characters won't get along...but do the rules of Battle conflict with the beliefs of the Scarabs?? > > Oh ye of little understanding. > > If you continue to attack/kill another cabal's membership, what > > do you expect to happen? > > > > > > > > > Let's see, maybe they just take it because the > > > > Sacrabites want to be enemies with Battle. > > > > Grissztok - will attack battle on sight > > > > Zaendiir - Mage but tends to only attack battle > > > > if they already engaged > > > > Draktha - Mage, attacks battle on sight > > > > Some wolf that I do not remember the name. > > > > As far as I know at least in hero range, > > > > the cabal always tends to attack the Battleragers > > > > and seek to be enemies unlike Arbiter or entropy. > > > > so why not take theif item and make them a little > > > > less powerful? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Complaint: Battleragers taking the Scarab item > > > > > Reason: > > > > > This is going to sign like a whine, as if we can't handle getting the object back. That's not really it, though. I'd have a problem with this, regardless. Yes, the Cult is made up almost exclusivly from mages. And battle should definitly hunt down and kill these mages at any given time. However, I don't know of any reason why they would have a problem with the Cult and their beliefs. You don't see Battle raiding Arbiter or Entropy because they accept mages. I think one should only attack a Cabal for the item when the Cabal has "sinned" against their beliefs. And if a person in the cabal has "sinned"...then kill the person. They should be two seperate issues.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]