Re: Sylvan conjurers:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Dyston on August 31, 1999 at 02:39:24:

In Reply to: Re: Sylvan conjurers posted by Callowin on August 31, 1999 at 00:31:42:

> > Somehow I don't really see the summoning of devils and demons and such fitting in with Sylvan ideology. Guess we'll have to wait and see what Sebeok thinks.

> I agree. Transmuters and invokers fit nicely. One can become creatures of nature, and one can manipulate elements of nature. Conjurers don't seem to do anything but threaten nature by bringing creatures from another plane entirely into Thera. Besides, I even have trouble with the idea of forcing an angel to help you as a good.

> Can anyone rationalize how a conjurer could be construed as pro-nature?

In my opinion, I need to know more about conjurers.

If you are a lightwalker, is what you summoned considered "ripped" from
his plane? This has validity for me. A familiar I could definitely
understand, but an angel/archon, I don't know.

We would also need to consider a neutral conjurer's ability to summon
devils. This could be a point of interest for me. Being an elf, I'd
have a hard time being convinced a devil could be used to protect the
wilds.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]