Re: Sylvan conjurers

Re: Sylvan conjurers:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Callowin on August 31, 1999 at 00:31:42:

In Reply to: Re: Sylvan conjurers posted by Mendeiron on August 30, 1999 at 05:23:50:

> Somehow I don't really see the summoning of devils and demons and such fitting in with Sylvan ideology. Guess we'll have to wait and see what Sebeok thinks.

I agree. Transmuters and invokers fit nicely. One can become creatures of nature, and one can manipulate elements of nature. Conjurers don't seem to do anything but threaten nature by bringing creatures from another plane entirely into Thera. Besides, I even have trouble with the idea of forcing an angel to help you as a good.

Can anyone rationalize how a conjurer could be construed as pro-nature?

Follow Ups:

Re: Sylvan conjurers Dyston 02:39:24 8/31/99 (0)
Re: Sylvan conjurers sparky 01:04:59 8/31/99 (2)
- Re: Sylvan conjurers - Herein may lie the problem Mendeiron 04:59:41 8/31/99 (1)
  - Re: Sylvan conjurers - Herein may lie the problem sparky 05:46:52 8/31/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > Somehow I don't really see the summoning of devils and demons and such fitting in with Sylvan ideology. Guess we'll have to wait and see what Sebeok thinks. > I agree. Transmuters and invokers fit nicely. One can become creatures of nature, and one can manipulate elements of nature. Conjurers don't seem to do anything but threaten nature by bringing creatures from another plane entirely into Thera. Besides, I even have trouble with the idea of forcing an angel to help you as a good. > Can anyone rationalize how a conjurer could be construed as pro-nature?