Re: Pets

Re: Pets:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Ex-Arbiter on September 01, 1999 at 11:14:46:

In Reply to: Pets posted by widowson on September 01, 1999 at 09:27:36:

> I was under the understanding that all Pets and Mobs controlled by you were viewed as an extention of your person. If you attack with one, you are attacking in the same way that use a weapon. Yeah, it's the sword doing the hurting but you are causing it to do that.

> If I was an arbie, I'd flag if someone attacked a familiar. Why? The Law doesn't define EXACTLY what an "attack" is. I would view any action taken to hurt another character as an attack and would flag so on this point, I disagree with you.

> -widowson

Thats easier said than done with a million fucking Conjurers running around now :p

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > I was under the understanding that all Pets and Mobs controlled by you were viewed as an extention of your person. If you attack with one, you are attacking in the same way that use a weapon. Yeah, it's the sword doing the hurting but you are causing it to do that. > > If I was an arbie, I'd flag if someone attacked a familiar. Why? The Law doesn't define EXACTLY what an "attack" is. I would view any action taken to hurt another character as an attack and would flag so on this point, I disagree with you. > > -widowson > Thats easier said than done with a million fucking Conjurers running around now :p