Two reasons

Two reasons:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by The Ponderer on September 07, 1999 at 08:14:17:

In Reply to: Re: Daishan has a point, and it makes sense in an RP manner. posted by Saerin on September 07, 1999 at 08:05:39:

The helpfile is contradictory. Battleragers are those that succumb to their passions and rage in combat. They're barbarians, not aristocratic knights of the round table. If they WERE weaponsmasters and not barbarians they'd have cabal powers like, umm, yelling "Touche ole chap!" thereby increasing their umm, hit dam by 10. Instead, these BARBARIANS wear the remains of their kills, lust for blood, surround themselves with hatred and so forth. When thinking of battleragers, think of Huns.

2)His contention is that mastering your skills makes you better than those that don't, regardless of whether or not you're a complete fool and they're a gaming genius.

Follow Ups:

Re: Point of view Saerin 08:35:36 9/07/99 (3)
- Re: Point of view Dr. Dooom 17:15:40 9/07/99 (2)
  - Re: If I were the leader of Battle... Saerin 03:00:03 9/08/99 (1)
    - Re: If I were the leader of Battle... Graatch(VIP) 05:24:31 9/09/99 (0)
Woah hold on there cowboy Daishan 08:22:10 9/07/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> The helpfile is contradictory. Battleragers are those that succumb to their passions and rage in combat. They're barbarians, not aristocratic knights of the round table. If they WERE weaponsmasters and not barbarians they'd have cabal powers like, umm, yelling "Touche ole chap!" thereby increasing their umm, hit dam by 10. Instead, these BARBARIANS wear the remains of their kills, lust for blood, surround themselves with hatred and so forth. When thinking of battleragers, think of Huns. > 2)His contention is that mastering your skills makes you better than those that don't, regardless of whether or not you're a complete fool and they're a gaming genius.