Re: I agree. Did I say that?:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Saerin on September 09, 1999 at 03:22:10:

In Reply to: my 2 cents posted by Arolin on September 08, 1999 at 12:42:00:

> While alot of what you say makes sense, i simply remind you to watch the balance. It is easy to think that paladins are under par, but i dont believe this is the case, its simply a matter of people not wanting to do empowerment, and them not having any decent cabal to go too. There is also some dominance to evil because of this.
> Excluding cabals, paladin vs each other class, i think paladins are quite balanced.
> Of course i cant comment on the power of your new ideas since you never really know until they are put in action.

I normally don't agree with you because we seem to
approach CF a little differently, but I think you
are exactly right.

It's really odd to have a paladin in a cabal that
is really non-crusading for the most part. Arbiters
have their hands tied at a certain point, and Dawn
really wasn't meant to be another Knight type cabal.

A paladin knight was fairly formidable if played
right. Now there is nothing comparable.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]