Posted by Quintius on October 13, 2000 at 11:52:02:

In Reply to: A reply. posted by Lortaen on October 13, 2000 at 11:46:13:

> No, I'm mad at him because he was the one who brought in the moronic interpretation of Arbiter law that if you didn't use an Arbiter-approved raiding strategy, you could be flagged for raiding for your item. He fucked over Entropy. I don't have any problem being flagged when I deserve it, but I do have a problem with being flagged by malicious bastards twisting the law at their whim.

Would this be the "loitering" violation or if you attack an arbiter at the entrance and not the stern guard violation?

If so, it's been like that for as long as I can remember, i.e. the strict interpretation of Law #4, or did something new come along?

-Quint

P.S. Sorry about the "ass" comment, my bad.

Follow Ups:

• Explain this one. Feirshay 12:42:58 10/13/2000 (5)
  • Actually, that IS a tad fishy.. Quintius 18:11:25 10/13/2000 (0)
  • Technically, that's an improper flag. Something I'd take up in character, instead of whining OOC about it.(not to say you are whining here) n/t Mal 13:31:14 10/13/2000 (3)
    • Hey, smart guy.. entropies get kicked out of entropy for complaining to arbiter. Which is why people like Fuath flag randomly. n/t Way To Go, Genius 14:52:14 10/13/2000 (2)
      • Then it sounds like the problem lies in Entropy. If you can't handle that, don't be a baron. n/t Mal 17:09:20 10/13/2000 (1)
        • And if you cant handle posts on the forum, dont read them and complain about the author NT SB 10:46:37 10/15/2000 (0)

Post a Followup