Posted by Newsboy on October 29, 2000 at 19:21:07:
In Reply to: I give up posted by Imbrogno/Vacilis(VIP) on October 29, 2000 at 19:03:22:
> I just can't bring myself to play a battlerager. I role these things up, rank them to 20th or so, get ready to apply and then feel dirty and delete. Ragers just don't mesh with my worldview or something. Maybe idealist/counselors just can't play them. Killing will never my major focus when playing this game and obviously ragers need to really enjoy that aspect, I don't. I'd rather sit in the Inn or explore and ragers suck for both of those things. In any event, here's the role for Vacilis, who I'm sure would have been the first rager marked by Amaranthe(if such a thing is even possible). Just the latest on my long list of deleted wannabe ragers.
Ok. First is first. If you think Battle is JUST about killing i would of thought you of all the 'enlightened'
people would have more than a one dimensional view on a cabal. If you think ragers are bad at exploring, you're one sick man. It's called diversity Imbrogno, you don't have to be a great killer to be a rager. Ask Guen. As they say, there's more than one way to skin a cat.