Also...

Also...:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Character Board ]

Posted by Xeren on June 20, 2000 at 11:16:43:

In Reply to: My current character's role... Opinions? Thanks. (n/t) posted by Jaehiko on June 19, 2000 at 14:12:38:

Besides the implausibility of a rager being married to a necromancer, (to my understanding, I could be wrong) the females of the drow are never warriors, always priestesses of Lloth or mages. The males are also never mages and always put into the roles of warrior.

Follow Ups:

I think you might be mistaken, Xeren. Nivek 14:47:54 6/20/2000 (0)
Re: Also... Narev 14:41:40 6/20/2000 (1)
- Also Jheriohn 12:24:09 6/24/2000 (0)
(reply) Jaehiko 12:23:35 6/20/2000 (2)
- My opinion. Vargus 02:45:01 6/21/2000 (1)
  - Thanks, that's what I was shooting for. (n/t) Jaehiko 04:55:42 6/21/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> Besides the implausibility of a rager being married to a necromancer, (to my understanding, I could be wrong) the females of the drow are never warriors, always priestesses of Lloth or mages. The males are also never mages and always put into the roles of warrior.