(reply)

(reply):
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Character Board ]

Posted by Jaehiko on June 20, 2000 at 12:23:35:

In Reply to: Also... posted by Xeren on June 20, 2000 at 11:16:43:

I was looking for the "untraditional" family.. but it seems that I made it just a littttttle too drastic. hehe ;-) Thanks.

> Besides the implausibility of a rager being married to a necromancer, (to my understanding, I could be wrong) the females of the drow are never warriors, always priestesses of Lloth or mages. The males are also never mages and always put into the roles of warrior.

Follow Ups:

My opinion. Vargus 02:45:01 6/21/2000 (1)
- Thanks, that's what I was shooting for. (n/t) Jaehiko 04:55:42 6/21/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> I was looking for the "untraditional" family.. but it seems that I made it just a littttttle too drastic. hehe ;-) Thanks. > > > Besides the implausibility of a rager being married to a necromancer, (to my understanding, I could be wrong) the females of the drow are never warriors, always priestesses of Lloth or mages. The males are also never mages and always put into the roles of warrior.