I agree, without three necks the one neck would have to be extremely thick to compensate for bloodflow, unless this was a very dim creature. NT

I agree, without three necks the one neck would have to be extremely thick to compensate for bloodflow, unless this was a very dim creature. NT:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Character Board ]

Posted by Zaesyu on July 4, 2000 at 11:47:44:

In Reply to: Heh posted by Imbrogno on July 4, 2000 at 11:46:31:

> In my mind's eye three heads=three necks. I guess you could have one head on a neck and carry the other two in your hands, or just have three heads lined up like pumpkins on a fence rail without any necks at all, but I like the three heads and three necks the best.

> This is silly, why would you even bring this up? :)

Follow Ups:

who said he was talking about that head.... hmm maybe your not talking about that neack....nt Oh dear 18:17:48 7/4/2000 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > In my mind's eye three heads=three necks. I guess you could have one head on a neck and carry the other two in your hands, or just have three heads lined up like pumpkins on a fence rail without any necks at all, but I like the three heads and three necks the best. > > This is silly, why would you even bring this up? :)