who said he was talking about that head.... hmm maybe your not talking about that neack....nt

who said he was talking about that head.... hmm maybe your not talking about that neack....nt:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum Character Board ]

Posted by Oh dear on July 4, 2000 at 18:17:48:

In Reply to: I agree, without three necks the one neck would have to be extremely thick to compensate for bloodflow, unless this was a very dim creature. NT posted by Zaesyu on July 4, 2000 at 11:47:44:

> > In my mind's eye three heads=three necks. I guess you could have one head on a neck and carry the other two in your hands, or just have three heads lined up like pumpkins on a fence rail without any necks at all, but I like the three heads and three necks the best.

> > This is silly, why would you even bring this up? :)

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> > > In my mind's eye three heads=three necks. I guess you could have one head on a neck and carry the other two in your hands, or just have three heads lined up like pumpkins on a fence rail without any necks at all, but I like the three heads and three necks the best. > > > This is silly, why would you even bring this up? :)