The new provision for Nightgaunting is abit much, why were they toned down again? nt:
[
Follow Ups
] [
Post Followup
] [
Dioxide's CForum
]
Posted by *ORB* on July 31, 2000 at 13:25:02:
gdsgds
Follow Ups:
I'll be the first to say I have no idea wtf you're talking about
Nepenthe
(IMM)
13:30:47 7/31/2000
(13)
Hmm, I found a bug tho Nep
Beladorizid
14:12:55 7/31/2000
(2)
That's not a bug.
The Arcane(VIP)
14:29:11 7/31/2000
(1)
Hmm, they should add it as an affect then, cause it doesn't even echo when 48 hours are up. NT
Beladorizid
14:51:20 7/31/2000
(0)
I think I do. The fact that the Target has to be at full health now? If I'm wrong then I found a BUG. nt
*ORB*
14:06:32 7/31/2000
(8)
I've been naughted less then full health. nt
Warrior
17:39:47 7/31/2000
(0)
Wrong on both counts (n/t)
Nepenthe
(IMM)
14:10:10 7/31/2000
(6)
Seems I'll have to whip out my Log..... ;P
*ORB*
14:24:46 7/31/2000
(5)
Well the person wasn't Ghosted at the time so that's not it, it was a warrior battle rager. n/t
*ORB*
15:12:16 7/31/2000
(1)
There are reasons for this. Try a different target. n/t
Rendak
16:37:42 7/31/2000
(0)
I can think of a number of instances where a person could be at full health and not have "enough life energy". Perhaps if you told us who or what you were trying to nightgaunt. nt
Imbrogno
14:52:40 7/31/2000
(0)
Yes, I'm sure. (n/t)
Nepenthe the Frustratingly Vague
(IMM)
14:48:31 7/31/2000
(1)
Ahhhhhh, perhaps one of the few times a long erratic name really saved someone! n/t
*ORB* Slapping himself for being so foolish
17:05:32 7/31/2000
(0)
I think I do. The fact that the Target has to be at full health now? If I'm wrong then I found a BUG. nt
*ORB*
14:06:22 7/31/2000
(0)
Post a Followup
Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:
> gdsgds
[
Follow Ups
] [
Post Followup
] [
Dioxide's CForum
]