Posted by Nepenthe(IMM) on July 31, 2000 at 13:30:47:

In Reply to: The new provision for Nightgaunting is abit much, why were they toned down again? nt posted by *ORB* on July 31, 2000 at 13:25:02:

And on that note, are you absolutely sure you do know what you're talking about?

Follow Ups:

• Hmm, I found a bug tho Nep Beladorizid 14:12:55 7/31/2000 (2)
  • That's not a bug. The Arcane(VIP) 14:29:11 7/31/2000 (1)
    • Hmm, they should add it as an affect then, cause it doesn't even echo when 48 hours are up. NT Beladorizid 14:51:20 7/31/2000 (0)
• I think I do. The fact that the Target has to be at full health now? If I'm wrong then I found a BUG. nt *ORB* 14:06:32 7/31/2000 (8)
  • I've been naughted less then full health. nt Warrior 17:39:47 7/31/2000 (0)
  • Wrong on both counts (n/t) Nepenthe(IMM) 14:10:10 7/31/2000 (6)
    • Seems I'll have to whip out my Log..... ;P *ORB* 14:24:46 7/31/2000 (5)
      • Well the person wasn't Ghosted at the time so that's not it, it was a warrior battle rager. n/t *ORB* 15:12:16 7/31/2000 (1)
        • There are reasons for this. Try a different target. n/t Rendak 16:37:42 7/31/2000 (0)
      • I can think of a number of instances where a person could be at full health and not have "enough life energy". Perhaps if you told us who or what you were trying to nightgaunt. nt Imbrogno 14:52:40 7/31/2000 (0)
      • Yes, I'm sure. (n/t) Nepenthe the Frustratingly Vague(IMM) 14:48:31 7/31/2000 (1)
        • Ahhhhhh, perhaps one of the few times a long erratic name really saved someone! n/t *ORB* Slapping himself for being so foolish 17:05:32 7/31/2000 (0)
• I think I do. The fact that the Target has to be at full health now? If I'm wrong then I found a BUG. nt *ORB* 14:06:22 7/31/2000 (0)

Post a Followup