Posted by Graham on July 6, 2000 at 03:22:30:
In Reply to: Well... (text) posted by Proud Blade(VIP) on July 5, 2000 at 20:30:39:
Only some social interpretation available in Blackclaw. my further posts then went on to defend the fact that i actually gave a rats ass about cf and was interested in the culture whereas everyone is just discussing how to kill a lich. Is it wrong to try and find help for those of who don't play elves that are in actual fact dryads etc etc. Graham
Also..would you rather i tried to post 200+ page manuscripts on Dioxides forum or would you rather i posted a link and left it to the -intelligence- of the reader to trim out the obviously unrequired shit
(IE WARPSTONE, THE FACT THAT THEY ARE RATS, the fact that felar pc's can't play shaman yet there are felar shaman mobs *COUGH* poetry)
and people didn't point out that blackclaw portrayed felar culture well.
Poetry informed us of some of the culture and a player chipped in that yes and no blackclaw displayed anything..
p.s. Of course Proud Blade i'll be looking forward to your "Treatise on felar culture" a 200 page dictate on the felar mind. Or would that be me asking you to contribute?