Posted by Groaning on August 26, 1999 at 03:42:51:
In Reply to: There's a difference between NON-AGGRESSIVE and PASSIVE posted by Arantomir on August 26, 1999 at 03:11:23:
Is there no room for a passive sylvan? If not then I say that that's a crock of doo. I see no reason why there can't be SOME sylvans that do not wish to partake in endless bloodlust. Could a sylvan not believe in the natural spirit within all people and try to coerce that natural existance out through friendliness, lecturing, and example? Your view is exactly what I mean by dumbing down a cabal. If everybody thought like you did then life would get very boring very quick. I'd like to see a log of a peace-loving sylvan applicant interviewing with Hilaene, that'd be hilarious I'm sure. I'm not arguing that a sylvan should view defiling as something of little consequence. What I don't agree with is the thug mentality that seems to be dominant in the cabal at this time. As an aside, I have never partaken in mudsex and I don't ever plan to.