Posted by Scarabite1 on August 27, 1999 at 04:25:32:

In Reply to: Scarabites posted by Someone thinking on August 27, 1999 at 03:07:54:

Pay attention...the point is they didn't raid for the head. Player fighting doesn't translate into Cabal wars. Battle/Cult war is random. Yes, most of their characters won't get along...but do the rules of Battle conflict with the beliefs of the Scarabs??

> Let's see, maybe they just take it because the
> Sacrabites want to be enemies with Battle.

> Grissztok - will attack battle on sight

> Zaendiir - Mage but tends to only attack battle
> if they already engaged

> Draktha - Mage, attacks battle on sight

> Some wolf that I do not remember the name.

> As far as I know at least in hero range,
> the cabal always tends to attack the Battleragers
> and seek to be enemies unlike Arbiter or entropy.
> so why not take theif item and make them a little
> less powerful?

>
>
> > Complaint: Battleragers taking the Scarab item

> > Reason:
> > This is going to sign like a whine, as if we can't handle getting the object back. That's not really it, though. I'd have a problem with this, regardless. Yes, the Cult is made up almost exclusivly from mages. And battle should definitly hunt down and kill these mages at any given time. However, I don't know of any reason why they would have a problem with the Cult and their beliefs. You don't see Battle raiding Arbiter or Entropy because they accept mages. I think one should only attack a Cabal for the item when the Cabal has "sinned" against their beliefs. And if a person in the cabal has "sinned"...then kill the person. They should be two seperate issues.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Scarabites Observing Observer 04:31:04 8/27/99 (10)
  • Re: Scarabites Scarabite1 05:02:01 8/27/99 (9)
    • You must be retarded. Lucian 02:35:18 8/29/99 (0)
    • Re: Scarabites Stealer of Souls 05:28:15 8/27/99 (0)
    • Re: Scarabites Stealer of Souls 05:21:59 8/27/99 (0)
    • Re: Scarabites Observing Observer 05:19:44 8/27/99 (5)
      • Hm...ok. The Great Rumpus Cat 13:41:32 8/28/99 (4)
        • Re: Hm...ok. Observing Observer 15:15:55 8/28/99 (3)
          • Ah ha. The Great Rumpus Cat 15:42:45 8/28/99 (2)
            • Re: Your answer should be in the form of a question. Observing Observer 16:23:18 8/28/99 (1)
              • Re: Your answer should be in the form of a question. The Great Rumpus Cat 02:39:03 8/30/99 (0)

Post a Followup