Posted by sparky on September 07, 1999 at 06:27:41:

I am quite pleased that AP's are not allowed in masters any longer...I had a hard time finding justification for letting them in in the first place. Any arguments for or against that statement are opinion, just like the statement itself.

But here's another one for you....Bards in the Ragers cabal....What is the justification? I mean, they are decent fighters, I guess...but they are dependant on something beyond their physical capabilities - song. Sure it isn't "Magic" by definition (a song that creates a fireball isn't magic? OK so that's open to interpretation), but supplications are not magic either, and shamans are not allowed into the cabal. A much better comparison would be AP's in Battle...they are more "fighter" oriented than bards, yet they are not allowed into the cabal?

Allright, I'm playing the devil's advocate a bit, trying to start a discussion...but I really would like to know the justification for letting a class like a bard into the Ragers.

sparky

Follow Ups:

• Re: bards in battle The Ponderer(VIP) 06:54:32 9/07/99 (5)
  • Fire and Ice Nepenthe 16:44:17 9/07/99 (0)
  • Once again, you are insane Daishan 07:17:00 9/07/99 (3)
    • Re: Once again, you are insane The Ponderer(VIP) 07:25:59 9/07/99 (2)
      • Wrong, sorry, thanks for playing! Reality Check 11:48:38 9/07/99 (0)
      • Re: Old strategy Swist 10:51:34 9/07/99 (0)
• Ap's are allowed in Battle as long as they dont use magic n/t Dark Bard 06:43:37 9/07/99 (0)
• Bards in Battle Axl Rose 06:37:13 9/07/99 (3)
  • Exactly...but sparky 06:43:14 9/07/99 (2)
    • Well here it is Daishan 06:49:37 9/07/99 (1)
      • Ah, well done. thank you (n/t) sparky 06:50:51 9/07/99 (0)

Post a Followup