Hate to say it: Duh.

Hate to say it: Duh.:
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]

Posted by Tat on September 01, 1999 at 07:56:15:

In Reply to: Laws and the new conjurers posted by Grummore on September 01, 1999 at 07:16:25:

>didnt even though off before.
=didn't even think of before.

>Per exemple, if thier
=For example, if their

>hurt because thier familiar died? hum? Well In the eyes laws, no one is to be flagged for that since this
=hurt because their familiar died? Hmm? Well, in the eyes of the laws, nobody shall get flagged for it because it

>But, let's say, your familiar, steal in town, while you are outside the town and
=Let's say, your familiar steals in town, while you are outside town controlling it.

>if we can proove you asked your monkey to steal someone in town, you will be flagged (in my opinion),
=If we can prove that you asked your monkey to steal from someone in town, you will be flagged for it (in my opinion).

>but I havent yet seen such a case so I can't see if it's provable already.
=Although, I haven't seen such a case yet so I can't see if it's provable already.

Run on sentence from hell.

>What I see, it's that it's more difficulties add to the arbiters jobs and to show peoples that beein an arbiters is a very hard times.
=What I see, is that it is adding more difficulties to the arbiters' jobs and to show people that being an arbiter is hard sometimes.

>No other cabals get such complain, such whining and such ungrateful in thier whole life than the arbiter cabal can get in 1 week.
=No other cabal get such complaining, whining and ungrateful people in their whole existance then the Arbiters do in a week.

> Now, the point is that if you, peoples, have to complains about the new conjurers tricks in town, be patient, it's a new dimension, us, arbiters have to deal with.
=Now, the point of this is that if you people, have to complain about the new conjurers' tricks in town, be patient, it's a new dimension that we have to deal with.

> Grummore
=Grummore, the unskilled at, hopefully, his second language.

Follow Ups:

Re: Hate to say it: Duh. Moore. 16:24:32 9/01/99 (0)
If you want, we can speak and write french, maybe we will all laugh at you? That's completely stupid what you did, I know I am not good, but if you wanted to correct me you just had to mail me (period) N/T Grummore 13:19:02 9/01/99 (0)
Translation... Tat 08:00:52 9/01/99 (11)
- Translation of the translation If you're going to get all huffy about grammar, idiot... 08:09:57 9/01/99 (10)
  - Translation of the translation of the translation Tat 08:21:17 9/01/99 (5)
    - Re: Is this a contest of who can look the most stupid on the forum? (nt) Rune 08:42:08 9/01/99 (4)
      - Yes, and is is "Stupidest". Tat 08:58:38 9/01/99 (3)
        
        *Agreeing with Rune* and tat you retard, you make fun of him then make an error in your post so shut up. WHO CARES ABOUT SPELLING AND GRAMMER? Jeeze...everyone just shut up and calm down. n/t Snuff 09:51:20 9/01/99 (2)
        
        getting lazy typing your whole nick Snu? (nt) Tat 07:03:30 9/02/99 (1)
        
        Why don't you stop making fun of people? Who cares if he spelt a few things wrong, he might be young, from another country, have a learning disability and your making fun of him. How would that make you feel? n/t Snuffalufagus 09:02:49 9/02/99 (0)
  - Shut the fuck up, Graatch. Uhm's Student 08:19:22 9/01/99 (3)
    - I did not post above, you guessed wrong. Asshole. N/T Graatch 18:59:40 9/01/99 (0)
    - This is why Glimo's went down, You all need to watch what you say and not have these little hissy fights. n/t Ranger on Board 12:09:28 9/01/99 (1)
      - that's "y'all", not "you all" ;) N/T sparky 12:43:07 9/01/99 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-mail:
Subject:
Comments:	> >didnt even though off before. > =didn't even think of before. > >Per exemple, if thier > =For example, if their > >hurt because thier familiar died? hum? Well In the eyes laws, no one is to be flagged for that since this > =hurt because their familiar died? Hmm? Well, in the eyes of the laws, nobody shall get flagged for it because it > >But, let's say, your familiar, steal in town, while you are outside the town and > =Let's say, your familiar steals in town, while you are outside town controlling it. > >if we can proove you asked your monkey to steal someone in town, you will be flagged (in my opinion), > =If we can prove that you asked your monkey to steal from someone in town, you will be flagged for it (in my opinion). > >but I havent yet seen such a case so I can't see if it's provable already. > =Although, I haven't seen such a case yet so I can't see if it's provable already. > Run on sentence from hell. > >What I see, it's that it's more difficulties add to the arbiters jobs and to show peoples that beein an arbiters is a very hard times. > =What I see, is that it is adding more difficulties to the arbiters' jobs and to show people that being an arbiter is hard sometimes. > >No other cabals get such complain, such whining and such ungrateful in thier whole life than the arbiter cabal can get in 1 week. > =No other cabal get such complaining, whining and ungrateful people in their whole existance then the Arbiters do in a week. > > Now, the point is that if you, peoples, have to complains about the new conjurers tricks in town, be patient, it's a new dimension, us, arbiters have to deal with. > =Now, the point of this is that if you people, have to complain about the new conjurers' tricks in town, be patient, it's a new dimension that we have to deal with. > > Grummore > =Grummore, the unskilled at, hopefully, his second language.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Dioxide's CForum ]