Posted by Arolin on October 13, 1999 at 18:24:59:

I agree, i think its wrong for so many ragers to be virtually immune to invokers. Ok the defenders thats fair enough, let them have spell area defence, but not the berserksers, Invokers cant summon things to counter thirst, invokers cant do shit to berskers thirsting at all and the berserker also has haste (fucking bs too) and deathblow.
its wonder if any of the ragers would play a defender. I still think scout is worth while.
Time and time again all new things are always too powerful, i sometimes wonder how the imms dont pick up on this, any experienced mudder with atleast 3 thousand hours of mudding on his belt (includes all imps) can see how most of these new things which are always powered down later will be too powerful. Time and time again it happens, perhaps its time to change the way things are tested, and give the non-imps the ability to set character levels on the test site for christ sake.
..and no this is not related to the fact that there are heaps of ragers at the moment, that is the thought of the inexperienced.

If you take the berserker and want to improve its power, then do so where it makes the majority of classes slightly at a disadvantage, rather than making 1 char completly crap.

ps. no i am not playing an invoker.

Follow Ups:

• My interpretation of Graatch & Arolin's whines Stealer of Souls 08:21:04 10/14/99 (0)
• Diarmuid/Graatch: You are missing the point curious 06:36:08 10/14/99 (9)
  • You've just proved my point. Diarmuid/Graatch 16:20:52 10/14/99 (8)
    • Nitpicking (but it's an important nit) Nepenthe 23:33:23 10/14/99 (4)
      • Just a few things. And I appreciate the reasonableness of your posting, unlike some who simply choose to be insulting or flame. Diarmuid/Graatch 04:40:17 10/15/99 (3)
        • Re: Just a few things. And I appreciate the reasonableness of your posting, unlike some who simply choose to be insulting or flame. Klaak 06:22:09 10/15/99 (0)
        • Re: Reason for Powers Domenias 05:34:39 10/15/99 (1)
          • You are missing the point. Diarmuid 05:54:53 10/15/99 (0)
    • On the contrary Brahk 17:52:02 10/14/99 (2)
      • Re: On the contrary Arolin 18:19:25 10/14/99 (1)
        • Re: On the contrary Stealer of Souls 11:05:05 10/15/99 (0)
• Ragerpower ! (Could be a new ear-hanger) Py 03:16:20 10/14/99 (1)
  • Get spelled up, dopple, attack, flee to aggro mob. n/t Defiler 06:03:49 10/14/99 (0)
• Re: my 2 cents on graatchs' comment on ragers Abernyte/Euan 01:35:53 10/14/99 (9)
  • I haven't seen any offensive major forms around for a while. I'm sure they could crush a rager easily enough. n/t Dorge 15:23:36 10/14/99 (2)
    • Re: I haven't seen any offensive major forms around for a while. I'm sure they could crush a rager easily enough. n/t Klaak 05:44:00 10/15/99 (1)
      • yeah but.......... Euan 07:42:40 10/15/99 (0)
  • Two wrongs does not make a right. Diarmuid/Graatch 02:33:49 10/14/99 (4)
    • Re: Two wrongs does not make a right. Abernyte/Euan 02:51:16 10/14/99 (3)
      • You are missing the point. Diarmuid/Graatch 02:58:24 10/14/99 (2)
        • Re: You are missing the point. Klaak 04:29:45 10/14/99 (1)
          • Re: You are missing the point. Diarmuid 05:57:49 10/15/99 (0)
  • Oh I agree with what your saying, i would have been happy to admit that we had powerful stuff before too, i tried to angle my post to the imms for time after time making too powerful initially (n/t) Arolin 02:20:59 10/14/99 (0)
• Nothing annoys me more these days than having to say the following: Arolin is exactly right. Hit the bullseye. Dammit. n/t Diarmuid/Graatch 18:35:28 10/13/99 (2)
  • Or... n/t Brahk 21:33:41 10/13/99 (1)
    • Re: Or... WhiteStar 23:08:18 10/13/99 (0)

Post a Followup